STUDY AT A GLANCE
        
        
          
            THE STUDY:
          
        
        
          In an eight-week randomized controlled, parallel-arm invention,
        
        
          73 healthy college students (41 women, 32 men) consumed either a
        
        
          snack of dry roasted almonds (56.7 g/day; 320 calories) or graham
        
        
          crackers (77.5 g/day; 338 calories). Changes were assessed from
        
        
          fasting serum/plasma samples at baseline and after four and eight
        
        
          weeks. Acute effects were assessed during a two-hour oral glucose
        
        
          tolerance test (OGTT) at eight weeks.
        
        
          
            RESULTS:
          
        
        
          Almond snacking resulted in a smaller decline in HDL cholesterol over
        
        
          eight weeks (13.5% vs 24.5%, p<0.05), 13% lower two-hour glucose
        
        
          area under the curve (AUC), 34% lower insulin resistance index (IRI)
        
        
          and 82% higher Matsuda index (p<0.05) during the OGTT, when
        
        
          compared with the cracker group. Both groups had similar modest
        
        
          body mass gains over eight weeks. In general, both almond and
        
        
          cracker snacking reduced fasting glucose and LDL cholesterol.
        
        
          
            STUDY LIMITATIONS:
          
        
        
          • The lack of a “no morning snack” group is a limitation that precludes
        
        
          assessment of breakfast skipping physiological responses. However,
        
        
          other studies have previously demonstrated the physiological effects
        
        
          of breakfast skipping among various populations.
        
        
          6
        
        
          • Although the body mass gained in both groups was mostly fat-free
        
        
          mass (0.6 kg), the limitations of bioelectrical impedance analysis in
        
        
          accurately assessing body composition, particularly in individuals
        
        
          with obesity, and the limitation of accelerometers in assessing
        
        
          activity during strength training should be considered while
        
        
          interpreting this finding.
        
        
          • Researchers did not conduct the same five-time point OGTT
        
        
          prior to the intervention, as done at eight weeks for a pre-post
        
        
          intervention assessment. However, there were no differences in
        
        
          baseline fasting insulin sensitivity between groups.
        
        
          • The seven-day spring break that immediately followed the mid-
        
        
          point of the intervention was a limitation. However, the lack of
        
        
          remarkable differences at week four that were ultimately captured
        
        
          at week eight implies that the impact of such an interruption at the
        
        
          mid-point was not profound.
        
        
          
            CONCLUSION:
          
        
        
          Incorporating a morning snack in the dietary regimen of predominantly
        
        
          breakfast-skipping, first-year college students had some beneficial
        
        
          effects on glucoregulatory and cardiometabolic health. Almond
        
        
          consumption has the potential to benefit postprandial glucoregulation
        
        
          in this cohort. These responses may be influenced by cardiometabolic
        
        
          risk factor status.
        
        
          • 13% lower two-hour glucose
        
        
          area under the curve (AUC).
        
        
          • 34% lower insulin resistance
        
        
          index (IRI).
        
        
          • 82% higher Matsuda index
        
        
          during oral glucose tolerance
        
        
          testing, which represents a gross
        
        
          estimation of insulin sensitivity.
        
        
          This index almost doubled
        
        
          among the almond snackers.
        
        
          • Better protection of HDL
        
        
          (good cholesterol) levels. Both
        
        
          groups saw reductions in HDL
        
        
          cholesterol, but the almond
        
        
          snackers’ levels fell by 13.5%
        
        
          compared to a 24.5% in graham
        
        
          cracker snackers.
        
        
          “This study, the first among a college
        
        
          student population, shows that for
        
        
          those who skip breakfast, almonds
        
        
          are a good snack choice,” says
        
        
          Rudy Ortiz, PhD, lead researcher of
        
        
          the study. “For almonds to double
        
        
          the Matsuda index over an eight-
        
        
          week period is profound, especially
        
        
          in a young, healthy population,
        
        
          illustrating the benefit in insulin
        
        
          sensitivity that almonds may provide.
        
        
          And almonds’ effect on several
        
        
          of the other glucoregulatory and
        
        
          cardiometabolic health parameters
        
        
          shows their potential as a smart
        
        
          snack, particularly in this group.”
        
        
          Results also showed that both groups
        
        
          gained a minimal amount of body
        
        
          mass over the course of the study,
        
        
          but that’s not surprising. New college
        
        
          students are prone to modest weight
        
        
          gain.
        
        
          8 9
        
        
          Several studies suggest that
        
        
          weight gain in college is associated
        
        
          with a decrease in physical activity.
        
        
          10
        
        
          11 12
        
        
          Despite the minimal increase in
        
        
          1 7
        
        
          S E P T E M B E R – O C T O B E R 2 0 1 8